Mulesoft vs Zapier - Key Difference

The concept existed years previously when the term Integration Platform-as-Service (or iPaaS) came into being. However, iPaaS represents simply a new approach to application, data flow, partners and API management integration. It serves as a platform for seamless integrations, connecting multiple business applications across a single business system. An iPaaS works in the cloud and, through a visual user interface, is less complex.

Integrating SaaS apps can be a point-click application, without local deployment of software. The company iPaaS platforms include various integration technologies, each for different applications. For less technically skilled purchasers, this could lead to confusion, then there is the possibility of purchasing more than necessary.

There are over 25 products that we know about when it comes to Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) products! MuleSoft, WSO2, Dell Boomi, Apache Camel, Oracle Service Bus, IBM DataPower Gateway, TIBCO, Microsoft BizTalk are among the most popular. We have selected and placed two of the highest-ranking integration platforms in this blog. So let the fight start between Zapier and Mulesoft!

What is Zapier?

Zapier is a simplified non-technical automation integrated product for individuals and small and medium enterprises. Just think of it as a growing partner API library! Zapier allows you to customize triggers that can be associated with specific actions or results. It is very simple, all of these application integrations or "lock points" are simple to configure and do not require any technical knowledge. Zap does not import existing data but automates workflow among hundreds of applications. Just a few clicks to connect or create custom integrations.

What is Mulesoft?

MuleSoft released several non-code tools powered by Salesforce's Einstein AI, having been accumulated by Salesforce in 2018. MuleSoft now reduces the complexity of monitoring logs, infrastructures, and servers in addition to providing data mapping recommendations to non-IT users. At the same time, the Anypoint platform still enables IT teams to monitor, manage and protect APIs. The pre-built integration frameworks called Accelerators are also supplied by Mulesoft.

An even stronger comparison between Zapier and Mulesoft integration options has been made. For aspects such as big data processing, data life cycle management, data virtualization, hierarchical data, master data management, and managing file transfers, MuleSoft is outstanding, while the functions of Zapier are not even for these tasks. Zapier does not.

In total, MuleSoft offers the best choice of data integration, since it provides developers with the necessary business features in this digital age with a more flexible and scalable solution. Zapier is not the best-placed integration tool if you are a large company.

Who’s more expensive Zapier or Mulesoft?

Enterprise integration software's real total ownership cost (TCO) includes software licenses, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if necessary), maintenance & support, etc. It is also important to add all these "hidden costs" when calculating the TCO. For Mule ESB and Zapier, we developed a TCO calculator.

The price of Mule ESB begins at $80,000 per annum between 1 and 10. Mule ESB has a 4 rating, lower than Enterprise Integration Software's average cost. When Zapier's price is compared to the competing companies at $19.99 a month, the software is classified as 6 - similar to the average software cost for the Enterprise Integration process.

Which Software includes better features?

Features and functionality must be taken into account, as with all business software solutions. The tool should provide support for your team's processes, workflows, reports, and needs. We compared Mule ESB Vs. Zapier is based on some of the most important and required Enterprise Integration functions to help you evaluate this. 

Zapier: import/export data, online client support, basic reports.

Mulesoft: 24/7 phone support, API, mobile access, online customer service. 

Target Customer Size: Zapier is suitable in every shape and size for individuals and companies seeking a solution for connecting and automating popular web apps with a single solution. Mulesoft ESB is best suited for large and large companies across a range of industries including retail, government, media and telecommunications, and health, and insurance industries. 

Conclusion: 

At the bottom of the line, Zapier is more expensive than Mulesoft, Zapier is higher rated than Mulesoft and Mulesoft offers more features than Zapier. But it's time for you to choose the one that is best suited to your organization and its needs.