In this fast-running world, companies are required to handle more number of projects. For this reason, managers are willing to have the best-suited software to manage, schedule, and organize the details of their particular project. Primavera and MS projects are well-known project management software for project planning, progress updating, tracking, reporting, and execution to mitigate the project's bustles and hustles. Many companies were using one of these two software to organize their project with utmost convenience. In this article, we will discuss ‘Primavera vs MS Project’ in detail.
Learn how to plan, manage, and execute projects, as well as allocating resources, tracking project progress, and fostering team collaboration through Mindmajix’s Primavera P6 Online Training. Enroll for Free Demo!
In this article, we have enlightened the essential aspects of Primavera p6 Vs MS Project which will help you understand both Primavera p6 and Microsoft Project.
In this Primavera Vs MS Project, we would be covering the following topics:
So let us get started with this Primavera vs Microsoft Project article,
Primavera and MS Project are the most widely used Softwares used for scheduling, planning, tracking, and reporting. The major differences between this two software are discussed below in detail.
Oracle Primavera has an excellent user interface, including graphs, but Primavera P6 Professional and other versions have a weaker User Interface. Whereas, MS Project is a powerful Graphical User Interface with captivating progress graphs, resources graphs, and histograms in MS Project and other packages.
Primavera has Professional and web-based architecture. In comparison, MS Project has three versions, such as Standard, Web-based, and Professional.
Primavera enables multiple user access and offers users to specify the feature of Primavera a user is required to use. Whereas MS Project does not allow multiple user access, but the server supports several projects simultaneously, but the user lacks a project when it is in use.
Primavera can establish more than one relationship between activities. We can have Start-to-Start (SS) and Finish-to-Finish (FF) between the same two activities. Whereas, MS Project can establish only one relationship between two activities.
Primavera documents, plans, and other project information can be converted to HTML directly from the software. In comparison, MS Project does not have such options.
In Primavera, users can display and assign unlimited Baselines to a schedule used for analysis. Whereas, in MS Project, the Baselines are limited to 11 for assigning tasks.
Primavera offers a Hint Help feature that defines the column's calculations and values whenever the cursor is placed on the field. Whereas, in MS Project, there is no such feature called Hint Help.
Primavera supports SQL or Oracle databases, and it allows users to install the database as standalone or a part of a server. Whereas, MS Project supports both Stand-alone and as a part of EPM. In Stand-alone, project details are saved in the .mpp format. In EPM, it works with the combination of MS SharePoint Server or Project Server. Project details are saved in the SQL database.
Primavera allows users to build a blank custom field without setting any formulas in the columns. In comparison, MS Project allows creating different custom fields from various project categories such as tasks, projects, or resources.
In Primavera, WBS is created separately from activities. Once WBS has been created, then we can add activities for each element. Whereas, in MS Project, activities are indented to make them look like a WBS.
Primavera allows users to record issues and risks. Whereas, in MS Project, the feature of tracking project issues and risks is lacking.
Primavera offers several useful columns around 200 that are installed, and each column represents information. It defines each category, such as budgeting, dates, variances, relationships, costs, etc. In comparison, MS Project supports over 500 default columns for resources and tasks.
In Primavera, the import/export function allows users to communicate the project data with other applications. It also allows exporting the data in various formats such as HTML, XLS, XER, XML, etc. Importing function enables to create of a new project from scratch by updating the existing project plan or XLS file. On the other hand, MS Project has a similar import and export logic function.
Primavera allows users to create sheet-like reports with default formats that can be customized easily. The reports are created in a tabular form only without having dashboards and graphical charts. In comparison, the graphical reports can be customized in any format and allow to insert of chart elements and allows users to create dashboards and charts.
In Primavera, users can add indirect expenses such as travel and training. It allows them to choose from assignment options such as the start, distribution, and finish date of a task. Whereas in MS Project, it allows users to define fixed costs for tasks, costs for material resources and rate-based resources costs. It also enables adding from the resource sheet and assigned tasks.
---- Related Article: Primavera P6 Tutorial for Beginners ----
The key features of Primavera Software are discussed below:
The main benefits of using Oracle Primavera are discussed as follows:
---- Related Article: Primavera Interview questions for freshers ----
The following are the limitations of using Primavera:
The following are the features of MS Projects.
---- Related Article: MS Project Tutorial ----
The following are the MS Project Pros:
The following are the MS Project Cons:
---- Related Article: MS Project Interview Questions and Answers ----
|1.||Primavera is a database based project management software.||MS Project software is a file-based project management software.|
|2.||It supports unique ID features and helps projects using ID systems.||It does not support unique ID features, and activity ID is based on the positions of the activity.
|3.||It enables multiple users to work on a project and specify the features required to use||It does not enable multiple user access to work on a single project|
|4.||It supports creating multiple activity relationships that are more than one type of relationship can be made between the activities.||It does not support such a feature, but it can establish one type of relationship between activities.|
|5.||It enables users to create sub-activities by breaking down the main activity into several steps, along with start and finish dates.||It does not allow such a function of creating sub-activities.|
|6.||It supports unlimited baselines.||It is restricted to 11 baselines.|
|7.||It allows issue and risk recording.||It lacks this feature of recording issues and risks of a project.|
|8.||It allows activity sorting through various fields such as by activity ID, date, etc.||It allows flexible activity control in which the individual activities can be moved from the positions to positions to display.|
|9.||It supports around 200 columns along with custom columns; each column provides useful information.||It supports around 40 columns only on the contrary part.|
|10.||It allows users to create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to add the activities.
||In MS Project, activities are made to appear like WBS.
|11.||It is best suited for developed countries.
||It is best suited for developing countries.
|12.||It supports the Progress spotlight feature to highlight table rows in a specific color.
||It does not support any such feature; rather, it allows creating filters for the same.
While concluding, both Oracle Primavera and Microsoft Project are well-known project management tools that assist project goals and organizational requirements. It’s not easy to pick one tool from another, as they both have their strategies and features. Based on the project requirements, we should determine which software helps to meet the specific type of project services to provide a high-quality CPM schedule. Each tool has unique features, and both aim for one goal to achieve Professional construction management services.